Hello workshop community,
I have a question about low-level decks and the trade-off between joist thickness and ventilation.
I have been reading through the many wonderful posts about low level decking, and I understand that 90x45 joists (/framing as it will be one layer) are seen as standard that can, in a pinch be replaced with 70x45 with more pedestals/supports (at 700mm instead of 1000mm).
We are looking to install a low level deck on top of existing pavers (these are quite uneven in places already). The height difference is around 1200mm between the internal floor and the existing pavers. We could go a bit higher as the sliding door frame comes up about 20mm, so we would not be disrupting an otherwise even transition. I'm leaning toward the minifoot pedestals (https://www.bunnings.com.au/builders-edge-25-40mm-minifoot-pedestal-feet_p2450073) for ease (plus I'm not too sure about dynabolting L brackets to the pavers as each is only 300x300mm).
The consideration I have is that we could use 90x45 joists with a 25mm ventilation gap (90mm joist + 25 mm pedestal + 23 mm for decking board = 138mm), or we could use 70x45 with a 45mm ventilation gap. Which one would be best for durability? We are planning to use joist tape and possibly other treatment on top. I would prefer to use H3 as it is a lot cheaper and more available.
Another consideration I have is that I would like to place weed matting underneath as we are already having issues with weeds between the pavers, which were installed with very little sand or weed protection by the previous owners. I am thinking that his matting would likely impact airflow as well.
I have attached a photo (the air-con unit is being moved) as well as my blueprint for the deck (I used SmartDraw which only has cms for metric measurements).

